Complete Science & Technical News Portal

- The Methodological Aspect of Development and Application Multivariate Classification G-mode for Analyses Geochemical Trend
- Estimating the Stability of a Delayed SIQRS Model with Temporary Immunity
- Study on Finite Dimensional Imprecise Numbers
- Recent Study on a High-Precision Registration Technology Based on Bundle Adjustment in Structured Light Scanning System
- Implementing and Solving Games with Best Payoff Method
- Customized Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (BCPAP) Device at the National Hospital Abuja Gives Immediate Clinical Improvement (Respiratory Rate, Grunting and Oxygenation) in Neonates with Respiratory Distress
- Experimenting on Spline Solution of Linear Seventh Order Boundary Value Problems Using Tenth Degree Functions and Comparison with Different Degrees of Spline Solutions
- Research on the Existence and Uniqueness of Limit Cycles in a Class of Planar Differential Systems
- The Research for Discovering Monthly Fuzzy Patterns
- Recognition and Prevention of Ocular Morbidity Due to Retinopathy of Prematurity in High Risk Twin Infant Pairs

Cell biology has entered the age of quantum biology. In some situations even a single electron

matters, particularly with respect to the mind-body dialogue. More and more bio-scientists depend on

a sound quantum physics. Biology is about stable matter: electrons, protons, neutrons and their

relation with photons. This elicits the question: Can we trust the ‘classic’ atomic model? The answer

is: No! This review summarises the not very much known discoveries of Kanarev, of Thomson and

Bourassa and of Mills, who each revealed an astonishing number of mistakes in the physics

underpinning atomic theory as it is instructed in introductory university courses. One mistake elicits

another and that might have been the reason why the developers of quantum theory found

themselves in front of such a difficult task. Mistakes were found in not considering the unity of

matterspace-time, in Bohr’s equation for line spectra, in the way Maxwell’s equations are applied

at the quantum level, in the way the original insights of Coulomb were mistreated, in the historical

abandonment of the concept of the aether by the experiment of Michelson and Morley, who disproved

a static aether, but not a dynamic one, and in the obsession of seeing particles at all levels. In an

independent way the above authors developed their own alternative theories in which the weird

aspects of classic quantum theory fade and become replaced by Newtonian mechanics and simple

algebra. It is amazing how these independent theories following entirely different approaches come to

quite similar insights. Some aspects of the new theories will be put together and compared. They are

very complementary, reinforcing each other and together building the main-frame for a new atomic

theory. Because these theories can only be touched briefly, the advice is to read the original

manuscripts and start the scientific debate.

**Author(s) Details**

**Laurent Jaeken
**Department of Applied Engineering, Karel de Grote University College, Antwerp University Association, Antwerp, Belgium.

View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/245

Related Posts